I’m beginning to question my art history grades.
As most people know, even if you didn’t go to university or college, when you write a paper you need to cite until your fingers fall off and footnote it until you cants footnotes no mores. I assumed it was plain knowledge because if you don’t do it you can/most likely WILL fail OR you will be accused of plagiarism and can even be kicked out of the school. So basically, you write papers with the hovering fear of getting in a lot of trouble AND getting a failing grade.
So, I received a 95% on my paper. Which is amazing, in my mind at least. I wrote papers in Toronto and received 79% or so on them, which in their slightly different grading paper is also REALLY good. Anyway, yesterday I was seeing students getting grades of 80% without even making ONE citation or footnote, let alone a bibliography. If I handed in a paper like that at U of T I would be shot and thrown in the street and these kids are getting 80s? So now I sit here with this paper of 95% wondering if it is even worth that much knowing I worked my ass off to get it done while these kids did hardly any work and handed in papers which didn’t even meet the minimum requirement of words and NO citations.
Does that make sense?
I want to know I’m paying a ridiculous amount of money for a better education than U of T and that my stress is really worth these “good grades”. Perhaps I should have bought a few cars instead.
If any of my peers read this and you were one of them, I congratulate you on your grade… however I just cannot help but question mine and its quality.